chill added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D33676#767746, @rogfer01 wrote:
> I understand that the scope `S` in this case is a (function) prototype scope > so it would not be the innermost block scope, would it? That said, GCC does > not accept `p_ok` above so probably this behaviour is sensible, after all in > C99 this is an extension. I actually missed the possibility of a function call expression to appear in such a context. I also think that GCC (and Clang) should accept the `p_ok` initializer, as they do if one adds `extern int call_to_undeclared();` at the beginning of the block. https://reviews.llvm.org/D33676 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
