chill added inline comments.
================
Comment at: test/Sema/implicit-decl.c:12
    int32_t compCount = 0;
-   if (_CFCalendarDecomposeAbsoluteTimeV(compDesc, vector, compCount)) { // 
expected-note {{previous implicit declaration is here}} \
-         expected-error {{implicit declaration of function 
'_CFCalendarDecomposeAbsoluteTimeV' is invalid in C99}}
+   if (_CFCalendarDecomposeAbsoluteTimeV(compDesc, vector, compCount)) { // 
expected-error {{implicit declaration of function 
'_CFCalendarDecomposeAbsoluteTimeV' is invalid in C99}}
    }
----------------
rogfer01 wrote:
> Is there a way not to lose the note?
The note is a part of the conflicting types diagnostic, that's no longer issued.


https://reviews.llvm.org/D33676



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to