delcypher wrote:

@MaskRay 
> The current -fsanitize-trap behavior is intentional. See
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/clang-gsoc-2025-usability-improvements-for-trapping-undefined-behavior-sanitizer/84568/11

Yes we aware the current behavior is intentional. That however doesn't mean 
it's the right behavior. Our intention is to post a corresponding RFC but as 
part of the RFC we also wanted a sketch patch of what we are proposing so we 
can be concrete about our proposed alternative. We (myself & @Michael137) are 
working with a @anthonyhatran a Google Summer of Code mentee to get the sketch 
patch in good shape and then we will work on an RFC and then post it.

Although I understand you have good intentions behind proactively closing the 
PR please do not close our mentee's PR again. If it's ultimately rejected, 
we'll do it.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/147997
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to