delcypher wrote: @MaskRay > The current -fsanitize-trap behavior is intentional. See https://discourse.llvm.org/t/clang-gsoc-2025-usability-improvements-for-trapping-undefined-behavior-sanitizer/84568/11
Yes we aware the current behavior is intentional. That however doesn't mean it's the right behavior. Our intention is to post a corresponding RFC but as part of the RFC we also wanted a sketch patch of what we are proposing so we can be concrete about our proposed alternative. We (myself & @Michael137) are working with a @anthonyhatran a Google Summer of Code mentee to get the sketch patch in good shape and then we will work on an RFC and then post it. Although I understand you have good intentions behind proactively closing the PR please do not close our mentee's PR again. If it's ultimately rejected, we'll do it. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/147997 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
