AaronBallman wrote:

> > avior due to the silent stripping. Given that an atomic type is not the 
> > same as its underlying type (in terms of ABI or semantics) I think we 
> > should diagnose the behavior with at least a warning. I could even be 
> > convinced it should be a warning which defaults to an error because this is 
> > just weird.
> 
> Yeah, I 100% agree with that. Warn-as-error is reasonable here IMO (as are 
> ANY qualifiers?, but more so for atomic)

Would you like me to diagnose any qualifier? And turn it into warning-as-error?

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/147802
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to