AaronBallman wrote: > > avior due to the silent stripping. Given that an atomic type is not the > > same as its underlying type (in terms of ABI or semantics) I think we > > should diagnose the behavior with at least a warning. I could even be > > convinced it should be a warning which defaults to an error because this is > > just weird. > > Yeah, I 100% agree with that. Warn-as-error is reasonable here IMO (as are > ANY qualifiers?, but more so for atomic)
Would you like me to diagnose any qualifier? And turn it into warning-as-error? https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/147802 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
