erichkeane wrote: > avior due to the silent stripping. Given that an atomic type is not the same > as its underlying type (in terms of ABI or semantics) I think we should > diagnose the behavior with at least a warning. I could even be convinced it > should be a warning which defaults to an error because this is just weird.
Yeah, I 100% agree with that. Warn-as-error is reasonable here IMO (as are ANY qualifiers?, but more so for atomic) https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/147802 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
