AaronBallman wrote:

> Hi all! So given the discussion above and that @erichkeane also okayed this, 
> can we finally proceed with this PR? I'd like to note that after discussing 
> it for the past month and a half, it still seems like we have no idea what 
> the ideal solution to the more-general problem could even look like in 
> principle (if it's even possible), never mind how to get there in practice. 
> Whereas this particular solution would address the issue we're facing, 
> without closing the door to any improvements we may think of later.

Yeah, I think we should move forward. This may not be ideal, but we also don't 
know what ideal will be and this is solving a problem.

Thank you for the really good discussion on this! I know it's frustrating to 
have long-running discussions, but we try to have a high bar for quality and 
that sometimes leads to this kind of thing, so we appreciate all the 
consideration given here,

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/141133
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to