AaronBallman wrote: > Hi all! So given the discussion above and that @erichkeane also okayed this, > can we finally proceed with this PR? I'd like to note that after discussing > it for the past month and a half, it still seems like we have no idea what > the ideal solution to the more-general problem could even look like in > principle (if it's even possible), never mind how to get there in practice. > Whereas this particular solution would address the issue we're facing, > without closing the door to any improvements we may think of later.
Yeah, I think we should move forward. This may not be ideal, but we also don't know what ideal will be and this is solving a problem. Thank you for the really good discussion on this! I know it's frustrating to have long-running discussions, but we try to have a high bar for quality and that sometimes leads to this kind of thing, so we appreciate all the consideration given here, https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/141133 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
