carlosgalvezp wrote: > The check can recognize side effects.
Ok, that's great! Did you have a chance to run the test on a large codebase (e.g. the llvm-project) and see if we get any FPs in this regard? > if the check does more than one thing (readability, performance) we should > place it under misc category That's a good point, I agree. Is there be a strong reason _not_ to put it in `misc`? https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/142324 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
