dwblaikie wrote: > > My intent (haven't checked the patch) is that it'd be modeled as a static > > member variable - so there'd be a declaration in the class, but a > > definition DIE outside the class that'd be indexed by gdb OK, I'd have > > thought? (it'd go in .debug_names, and gdb_index, I think - figure gdb > > would parse/index the definition DIE?) > > I think this would be fine. The crucial thing, I think, is that there's some > indication at the CU scope. This way the initial scan can take note of the > global and its address; then fully read the CU if the class type is needed at > some point.
As a note - when you say "at the CU scope" do you mean a direct child of the CU, or anything outside a function or class definition? (ie: could be inside a namespace) - Clang puts definitions, I think, in the namespace nearest the declaration for the definition - compare these: https://godbolt.org/z/EoK4noe7o https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/130255 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
