tromey wrote: > My intent (haven't checked the patch) is that it'd be modeled as a static > member variable - so there'd be a declaration in the class, but a definition > DIE outside the class that'd be indexed by gdb OK, I'd have thought? (it'd go > in .debug_names, and gdb_index, I think - figure gdb would parse/index the > definition DIE?)
I think this would be fine. The crucial thing, I think, is that there's some indication at the CU scope. This way the initial scan can take note of the global and its address; then fully read the CU if the class type is needed at some point. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/130255 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
