================
@@ -1696,7 +1696,11 @@ static NamedDecl* getLambdaCallOperatorHelper(const
CXXRecordDecl &RD) {
RD.getASTContext().DeclarationNames.getCXXOperatorName(OO_Call);
DeclContext::lookup_result Calls = RD.lookup(Name);
- assert(!Calls.empty() && "Missing lambda call operator!");
+
+ // This can happen while building the lambda.
+ if (Calls.empty())
+ return nullptr;
----------------
cor3ntin wrote:
I added an assert, which hinges on the fact that we don't look at the static
invoker in cases where the lambda is incomplete.
I agree that having these various states in lambdas is a bit unfortunate, but
it is a consequence of P2036.
If you have a better solution, I'm all ears!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/138121
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
