================
@@ -1696,7 +1696,11 @@ static NamedDecl* getLambdaCallOperatorHelper(const
CXXRecordDecl &RD) {
RD.getASTContext().DeclarationNames.getCXXOperatorName(OO_Call);
DeclContext::lookup_result Calls = RD.lookup(Name);
- assert(!Calls.empty() && "Missing lambda call operator!");
+
+ // This can happen while building the lambda.
+ if (Calls.empty())
+ return nullptr;
----------------
erichkeane wrote:
So I'm REALLY concerned about this. I don't think it is wrong, but just that
we need to make sure we handle this value correctly. At least
`getLambdaStaticInvoker` doesn't handle the `nullptr` correctly (though I guess
the other two uses DO, so thats fine).
I wouldn't mind a bit of an audit to make sure that uses of
`getLambdaStaticInvoker` (and perhaps the others, but as they already
acknowledged they could return null, i'm mildly less concerned) do a reasonable
thing.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/138121
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
