================
@@ -428,6 +429,52 @@ mlir::LogicalResult CIRGenFunction::emitBreakStmt(const
clang::BreakStmt &s) {
return mlir::success();
}
+const CaseStmt *CIRGenFunction::foldCaseStmt(const clang::CaseStmt &s,
+ mlir::Type condType,
+ mlir::ArrayAttr &value,
+ cir::CaseOpKind &kind) {
+ const CaseStmt *caseStmt = &s;
+ const CaseStmt *lastCase = &s;
+ SmallVector<mlir::Attribute, 4> caseEltValueListAttr;
+
+ // Fold cascading cases whenever possible to simplify codegen a bit.
+ while (caseStmt) {
+ lastCase = caseStmt;
+
+ auto intVal = caseStmt->getLHS()->EvaluateKnownConstInt(getContext());
+
+ if (auto *rhs = caseStmt->getRHS()) {
+ auto endVal = rhs->EvaluateKnownConstInt(getContext());
+ SmallVector<mlir::Attribute, 4> rangeCaseAttr = {
+ cir::IntAttr::get(condType, intVal),
+ cir::IntAttr::get(condType, endVal)};
+ value = builder.getArrayAttr(rangeCaseAttr);
+ kind = cir::CaseOpKind::Range;
+
+ // We may not be able to fold rangaes. Due to we can't present range case
+ // with other trivial cases now.
----------------
bcardosolopes wrote:
Sounds like it deserves an assert on missing features?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/138003
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
