AaronBallman wrote: > > > > @zahiraam @AaronBallman a different option would be to add a signed vs > > > > unsigned storage option to the `OPTION` and `BENIGN_ENUM_LANGOPT` > > > > macros so we can store negative enumerations safely > > > > > > > > > I think I would prefer this solution. We need to be able to set the > > > evaluation method to a value (-1) when it can't be known from the target > > > or when the value of `ffp-eval-method` is inconsistent with the target. > > > > > > Could we shift all the values, so `FEM_Indeterminable` is `0`? > > I don't think so. In practice on Linux systems, they use > `__FLT_EVAL_METHOD__` to control the type of `float_t` and `double_t`. Things > like this:
Oh shoot, I forgot this was tied to `__FLT_EVAL_METHOD__` https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/137661 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
