AaronBallman wrote: > > @zahiraam @AaronBallman a different option would be to add a signed vs > > unsigned storage option to the `OPTION` and `BENIGN_ENUM_LANGOPT` macros so > > we can store negative enumerations safely > > I think I would prefer this solution. We need to be able to set the > evaluation method to a value (-1) when it can't be known from the target or > when the value of `ffp-eval-method` is inconsistent with the target.
Could we shift all the values, so `FEM_Indeterminable` is `0`? https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/137661 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
