liliumShade wrote: > LGTM in general, but I have a question here: can you clarify the naming > strategy? The name used in `-mcpu` is `xiangshan-kunminghu`, which > corresponds to the `V2R2` version now apparently. Then, will there be > `V2R3`/`V3R2`/...? If so, what should we use in `-mcpu`? Thank you for raising this! To clarify: V2R2 is the current frozen version of kunminghu, the subsequent development in the plan will not affect the ISA string and pipeline.
If significant changes ever arise in a future major version (e.g., a hypothetical V3), we will introduce a new -mcpu name to reflect that divergence. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/123193 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
