AaronBallman wrote: > Hi @AaronBallman, bothering you again. I have a doubt about the merge of the > following case:  > > There is a lot of content that is `No documentation`, and to merge these > entries would be to create a very large entry, like this:  > > It doesn't look pretty, so if this doesn't have any impact, I'll follow this > proposal.
Oh yeah, that is not a good outcome. :-) I think `Undocumented` is a special case. For this patch, I would not merge if the category is `Undocumented`. In a completely separate patch, it might make sense to combine the `Undocumented` attributes into their own list that's a single table of the supported syntaxes, with one row per undocumented attribute. Then we're not repeating as much content such as `No documentation.` or the headings + the spellings. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/134089 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
