preames wrote: We have discussed whether to accept non-conforming vendor extensions in the past. Our consensus was clearly documented in RISCVUsage.rst in the statement " In particular, we expect to eventually accept both custom extensions and non-conforming extensions."
This is a non-conforming vendor extension, and that needs to be clearly described, but it is not blocking for whether we accept the change. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/133031 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
