NoQ added inline comments.
================ Comment at: lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/BugReporterVisitors.cpp:965 + + // Performing operator `&' on an lvalue expression is essentially a no-op. + // Then, if we are taking addresses of fields or elements, these are also ---------------- alexshap wrote: > "Address-of" operator can be overloaded, > just wondering - doest this code work correctly in that case ? In this case we'd see a `CXXOperatorCallExpr` instead of `UnaryOperator` (all hail clang AST!). https://reviews.llvm.org/D31982 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
