================ @@ -0,0 +1,17 @@ +// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c99 -fsyntax-only -verify %s ---------------- pinskia wrote:
> This feels like a pretty bare bones set of tests, I think we can do better. > > For example, it has been discussed that there should not be side effects, > let's verify that. Above in a comment `(int)var` was mentioned, we should > verify that. How about return values from functions which was also mentioned > above, we should verify it is usable in constant expressions etc Agreed. I have not written the testcases for GCC patch yet but I will make sure Kees's clang implementation matches up. Since GCC is in stage 4 and will be for one more month I am not going to submit the GCC patch until then so we have plenty of time to get agreement on the semantics of the builtin and such. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132524 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
