frederick-vs-ja wrote: > It looks like this is similar to `__builtin_constant_p` - what is the > proposed behavior wrt. side effects in the evaluated expression? gcc and > clang disagree about this a lot currently: https://godbolt.org/z/rbneznT9z
IIUC this intrinsic shouldn't be similar to `__builtin_constant_p`. It's just investing properties of the type and value category of an expression (like `std::is_lvalue_reference_v<decltype((expr))>` in C++ but with more magics). https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132524 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits