================
@@ -3185,6 +3185,53 @@ TEST_F(TokenAnnotatorTest, UnderstandsAttributes) {
EXPECT_TOKEN(Tokens[5], tok::r_paren, TT_AttributeRParen);
}
+TEST_F(TokenAnnotatorTest, UnderstandsNullabilityAttributes) {
+ auto Tokens = annotate("x = (foo *_Nullable)*v;");
+ ASSERT_EQ(Tokens.size(), 11u) << Tokens;
+ EXPECT_TOKEN(Tokens[3], tok::identifier, TT_Unknown);
+ EXPECT_TOKEN(Tokens[4], tok::star, TT_PointerOrReference);
+ EXPECT_TOKEN(Tokens[5], tok::kw__Nullable, TT_Unknown);
+ EXPECT_TOKEN(Tokens[7], tok::star, TT_UnaryOperator);
+
+ Tokens = annotate("x = (foo *_Nonnull)*v;");
+ ASSERT_EQ(Tokens.size(), 11u) << Tokens;
+ EXPECT_TOKEN(Tokens[3], tok::identifier, TT_Unknown);
+ EXPECT_TOKEN(Tokens[4], tok::star, TT_PointerOrReference);
+ EXPECT_TOKEN(Tokens[5], tok::kw__Nonnull, TT_Unknown);
+ EXPECT_TOKEN(Tokens[7], tok::star, TT_UnaryOperator);
+
+ Tokens = annotate("x = (foo *_Null_unspecified)*v;");
+ ASSERT_EQ(Tokens.size(), 11u) << Tokens;
+ EXPECT_TOKEN(Tokens[3], tok::identifier, TT_Unknown);
+ EXPECT_TOKEN(Tokens[4], tok::star, TT_PointerOrReference);
+ EXPECT_TOKEN(Tokens[5], tok::kw__Null_unspecified, TT_Unknown);
+ EXPECT_TOKEN(Tokens[7], tok::star, TT_UnaryOperator);
+
----------------
jvoung wrote:
I had thought it would be a nice comparison for the `tok::star` tokens to have
them together. But okay with removing too.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/130346
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
