HazardyKnusperkeks wrote: I still think Google should have to say what their style in clang-format is, extending to the default values of `AttributeMacros`.
I also wouldn't have such a big issue with adding it to the base style, because of the prefix and I think it's nice that Boost or Qt mostly work out of the box. The only problem I see is how clang-format parses those lists from yaml. I think there is no possibility to choose between adding or overwriting, if you put `AttributeMacros` in your `.clang-format`, but it just overwrites the values. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/130346 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
