================ @@ -22,56 +22,144 @@ // // RUN: %clang_cc1 -finclude-default-header -x hlsl -triple \ // RUN: spirv-unknown-vulkan-compute %s -fnative-half-type \ -// RUN: -emit-llvm -disable-llvm-passes -o - | FileCheck %s \ +// RUN: -emit-llvm -o - | FileCheck %s \ // RUN: -DFNATTRS="spir_func noundef nofpclass(nan inf)" -DTYPE=half // // ---------- No Native Half support test ----------- // // RUN: %clang_cc1 -finclude-default-header -x hlsl -triple \ -// RUN: spirv-unknown-vulkan-compute %s -emit-llvm -disable-llvm-passes \ +// RUN: spirv-unknown-vulkan-compute %s -emit-llvm \ // RUN: -o - | FileCheck %s \ // RUN: -DFNATTRS="spir_func noundef nofpclass(nan inf)" -DTYPE=float +// DXCHECK: define [[FNATTRS]] [[TYPE]] @ +// DXCHECK: %div1.i = fdiv reassoc nnan ninf nsz arcp afn [[TYPE]] ---------------- kmpeng wrote:
`%div1.i` is used as an operand in a lot following instructions and a different register is used for each instruction (`%7`, `%8`, `%9`). Would it be better practice to replace all of these register names with `[[DIV1_I:%.*]]` so it's clear they're all `%div1.i`, or would it be better to replace the first one with `[[DIV1_I:%.*]]`, the second with `[[DIV1_I_2:%.*]]`, etc.? https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/130320 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
