AaronBallman wrote: > > The compromise is to make it a warning which defaults to an error so users > > who hit the false positives have an escape hatch. > > OK, that's fair enough, I think. I can see it being controversial but I think > it's a defensible choice (that I agree with).
Yeah, my primary concern in terms of fallout is the behavior of `autoconf`. It'd be nice if we could understand the damage there before landing, but now that we're early in the 21.x cycle, we could land and see how it impacts early adopters. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/123470 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
