thesamesam wrote: > The compromise is to make it a warning which defaults to an error so users > who hit the false positives have an escape hatch.
OK, that's fair enough, I think. I can see it being controversial but I think it's a defensible choice (that I agree with). https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/123470 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
