================
@@ -186,6 +187,16 @@ BitcodeCompiler::BitcodeCompiler(Ctx &ctx) : ctx(ctx) {
std::string(ctx.arg.thinLTOPrefixReplaceNew),
std::string(ctx.arg.thinLTOPrefixReplaceNativeObject),
ctx.arg.thinLTOEmitImportsFiles, indexFile.get(), onIndexWrite);
+ } else if (!ctx.arg.DTLTODistributor.empty() && !ctx.bitcodeFiles.empty()) {
+ StringRef version = getenv("LLD_VERSION"); // For testing only.
----------------
bd1976bris wrote:
We thought it might be useful to pass this through to the distributor (via the
JSON). This could allow incompatible distributors to report a diagnostic.
Whilst this isn't useful immediately it might allow better diagnostics if the
implementation in LLVM changed in some incompatible way that forced the
distributors to be rewritten. We don't need this in our downstream
implementation, so I haven't really tested the utility. I'm happy to remove
this version stuff - at least for the initial support? However, I think some
sort of compatibility check may eventually be important.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126654
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
