Eugene.Zelenko added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D30650#695350, @klimek wrote:
> In https://reviews.llvm.org/D30650#693165, @Eugene.Zelenko wrote: > > > I think we should refactor this check as part of Static Analyzer, since > > it's path-sensitive. > > > Are you saying it should be path sensitive? Because currently it's not, right? It handle paths, as far as I could tell from regression test. But will it handle all possible paths? What about path reporting? And this is definitely duplication of Static Analyzer functionality. Repository: rL LLVM https://reviews.llvm.org/D30650 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
