klimek added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D30650#693165, @Eugene.Zelenko wrote:
> I think we should refactor this check as part of Static Analyzer, since it's > path-sensitive. Are you saying it should be path sensitive? Because currently it's not, right? https://reviews.llvm.org/D30650 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits