Hana =?utf-8?q?Dusíková?= <[email protected]>,
Hana =?utf-8?q?Dusíková?= <[email protected]>
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To: <llvm.org/llvm/llvm-project/pull/[email protected]>
================
@@ -1921,6 +1921,22 @@ static bool EvaluateFixedPointOrInteger(const Expr *E,
APFixedPoint &Result,
static bool EvaluateFixedPoint(const Expr *E, APFixedPoint &Result,
EvalInfo &Info);
+/// Support for atomic builtins
+static bool EvaluateAtomicOrder(const AtomicExpr *E, EvalInfo &Info);
+static bool EvaluateAtomicWeak(const AtomicExpr *E, EvalInfo &Info);
+static bool EvaluateAtomicLoad(const AtomicExpr *E, APValue &Result,
+ EvalInfo &Info);
+static bool EvaluatePointerAndStoreValueInto(Expr *ResultPtr,
+ APValue &ValueToStore,
+ EvalInfo &Info);
+static bool EvaluateAtomicLoadInto(const AtomicExpr *E, EvalInfo &Info);
+static bool EvaluateAtomicStore(const AtomicExpr *E, EvalInfo &Info);
+static bool EvaluateAtomicExchangeInto(const AtomicExpr *E, EvalInfo &Info);
+static bool EvaluateAtomicFetchOp(const AtomicExpr *E, APValue &Result,
+ EvalInfo &Info, bool StoreToResultAfter);
+static bool EvaluateAtomicCompareExchange(const AtomicExpr *E, APValue &Result,
+ EvalInfo &Info);
+
----------------
AaronBallman wrote:
I don't have a strong opinion either way currently, but because this is
constant expression evaluation and C++ already makes processing headers
painfully slow, we prefer reduced readability if it measurably improves
performance in this case. So measuring overhead may not be a bad idea.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/98756
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
