Hana =?utf-8?q?Dusíková?= <hani...@hanicka.net>,
Hana =?utf-8?q?Dusíková?= <hani...@hanicka.net>
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To: <llvm.org/llvm/llvm-project/pull/98...@github.com>
================
@@ -8075,6 +8089,64 @@ class ExprEvaluatorBase
return StmtVisitorTy::Visit(Source);
}
+ bool VisitAtomicExpr(const AtomicExpr *E) {
+ if (!EvaluateAtomicOrder(E, Info))
----------------
AaronBallman wrote:
Is it intentional that there's no check for C++26 anywhere to reject these uses
in earlier language modes? If you intend for this to be an extension in older
modes, that seems reasonable to me, but you should update
`clang/docs/LanguageExtensions.rst` to explicitly document the extension, add
the usual pre-compat/extension warnings, tests for those two new diagnostics,
and add a `RUN` line for an older language mode to your larger functionality
tests.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/98756
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
