================
@@ -831,6 +831,28 @@ ASTContext::getCanonicalTemplateTemplateParmDecl(
return CanonTTP;
}
+/// Check if a type can have its sanitizer instrumentation elided.
+/// Determine this by its presence in a SCL alongside its specified categories.
+/// For example:
+/// ignorelist.txt>
+/// [{unsigned-integer-overflow,signed-integer-overflow}]
+/// type:*=no_sanitize
+/// type:size_t=sanitize
+/// <ignorelist.txt
+/// Supplying the above ignorelist.txt will disable overflow sanitizer
+/// instrumentation for all types except "size_t".
+bool ASTContext::isTypeIgnoredBySanitizer(const SanitizerMask &Mask,
+ const QualType &Ty) const {
+ bool sanitizeType =
----------------
JustinStitt wrote:
I think `no_sanitize` will make it easier for users to understand what is
happening with the ignorelists. Of course we will always support the default of
no category. The performance difference is negligible: we will go from the best
case of 1 call to `isTypeIgnoredBySanitizer()` up to 2 calls to that method.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/107332
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
