================
@@ -831,6 +831,28 @@ ASTContext::getCanonicalTemplateTemplateParmDecl(
return CanonTTP;
}
+/// Check if a type can have its sanitizer instrumentation elided.
+/// Determine this by its presence in a SCL alongside its specified categories.
+/// For example:
+/// ignorelist.txt>
+/// [{unsigned-integer-overflow,signed-integer-overflow}]
+/// type:*=no_sanitize
+/// type:size_t=sanitize
+/// <ignorelist.txt
+/// Supplying the above ignorelist.txt will disable overflow sanitizer
+/// instrumentation for all types except "size_t".
+bool ASTContext::isTypeIgnoredBySanitizer(const SanitizerMask &Mask,
+ const QualType &Ty) const {
+ bool sanitizeType =
+ NoSanitizeL->containsType(Mask, Ty.getAsString(), "sanitize");
+
+ bool noSanitizeType =
----------------
vitalybuka wrote:
> Out of curiosity: What is a printing policy?
Not sure, but other users of containsType use policy.
> We do not want the canonical type, we should support typedefs.
Can you add a test to control that? with current patch canonical works.
Actually I was inspired by the patch to add -fsanitize=enum type ignore list,
and
without canonical `void f(enum MyEnum e)` is matched as `enum MyEnum`.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/107332
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
