================ @@ -416,6 +416,9 @@ Improvements to Clang's diagnostics name was a reserved name, which we improperly allowed to suppress the diagnostic. +- Clang now includes the return type of the function or constructor in the warning generated + when `[[nodiscard]]` is triggered by its placement on return types instead of function itself. ---------------- Sirraide wrote:
```suggestion - When diagnosing an unused return value of a type declared ``[[nodiscard]]``, the type itself is now included in the diagnostic. ``` I think this way it’s a bit easier to understand what’s happening here. This is the best I could do while trying to avoid the mouthful that is ‘ignoring a value returned from a call to a function returning a type marked nodiscard’. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112521 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
