falbrechtskirchinger wrote: > @falbrechtskirchinger Ooops, yes, it's true that the bug is gone w/ #111179. > > But I'd say if we're going to cherry-pick #111179, we have to backport its > precedent #103867 as well, so I think we can probably go ahead with this one > and backport it to 19, and then we can revert this one on the trunk - this is > indeed a bit awkward, but it depends whether it's worth backporting #103867 > @cor3ntin
I'd like this crash to be fixed in 19.x. > (Again, I apologize for not looking into it so carefully) No worries. To summarize: Land this PR and backport it. Revert on trunk. Submit new PR for the regression test? (We want to keep that, right?) https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110496 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
