zyn0217 wrote:

@falbrechtskirchinger Ooops, yes, it's true that the bug is gone w/ #111179.

But I'd say if we're going to cherry-pick #111179, we have to backport its 
precedent #103867 as well, so I think we can probably go ahead with this one 
and backport it to 19, and then we can revert this one on the trunk - this is 
indeed a bit awkward, but it depends whether it's worth backporting #103867 
@cor3ntin 

(Again, I apologize for not looking into it so carefully)

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110496
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to