dfukalov wrote: > Can you provide more context on the motivation / what you're trying to > achieve here? The motivation is as usual IWYU and similar refactoring - to reduce build time and probablility of non-related source(s) recompile. > Did you know that LLVM intentionally does not follow IWYU and favors forward > declarations: > https://llvm.org/docs/CodingStandards.html#include-as-little-as-possible Yes, but I actually do not see what part of the mentioned standard' section conflicts with the change. Would you please suggest an example where we see a situation when applied IWYU approach can contradict with the part of Coding Standards?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102707 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
