smeenai added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D27430#634880, @smeenai wrote:
> Sounds good to me for `_LIBCPP_HIDDEN`, but as far as I understand, for the > `inline _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY` cases, at least the `inline` needs to be > at the definition itself, otherwise it won't have any effect. Err this might actually have just been me being stupid. Lemme confirm that first. https://reviews.llvm.org/D27430 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
