================
@@ -855,6 +863,25 @@ __rndrrs(uint64_t *__p) {
}
#endif
+/* 11.2 Guarded Control Stack intrinsics */
+#if defined(__ARM_64BIT_STATE) && __ARM_64BIT_STATE
+static __inline__ void * __attribute__((__always_inline__, __nodebug__))
+__gcspr() {
+ return (void *)__builtin_arm_rsr64("gcspr_el0");
+}
+
+static __inline__ uint64_t __attribute__((__always_inline__, __nodebug__,
target("gcs")))
+__gcspopm() {
+ return __builtin_arm_gcspopm(0);
+}
+
+static __inline__ const void * __attribute__((__always_inline__, __nodebug__,
target("gcs")))
+__gcsss(const void *__stack) {
+ __builtin_arm_gcsss1(__stack);
+ return __builtin_arm_gcsss2(0);
+}
----------------
lenary wrote:
Would we ever expect these builtins to be called separately? If not, what's the
rationale for having two of them, rather than one that does both operations?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96903
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
