================
@@ -0,0 +1,40 @@
+//===--- PreferAtOverSubscriptOperatorCheck.h - clang-tidy ------*- C++ 
-*-===//
+//===--- PreferMemberInitializerCheck.h - clang-tidy ------------*- C++ 
-*-===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM 
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception
+//
+//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+
+#ifndef 
LLVM_CLANG_TOOLS_EXTRA_CLANG_TIDY_CPPCOREGUIDELINES_PREFERATOVERSUBSCRIPTOPERATORCHECK_H
+#define 
LLVM_CLANG_TOOLS_EXTRA_CLANG_TIDY_CPPCOREGUIDELINES_PREFERATOVERSUBSCRIPTOPERATORCHECK_H
+
+#include "../ClangTidyCheck.h"
+
+namespace clang::tidy::cppcoreguidelines {
+
+/// Enforce CPP core guidelines SL.con.3
----------------
PBHDK wrote:

> Maybe we can just replace the Doxygen comment above with what's in the 
> release notes + check description right now:
> > Flags the unsafe `operator[]` and suggests replacing it with `at()`.
> 
> What do you think?

@5chmidti just giving this a polite bump in case it got lost 🙂

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/95220
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to