================ @@ -0,0 +1,40 @@ +//===--- PreferAtOverSubscriptOperatorCheck.h - clang-tidy ------*- C++ -*-===// +//===--- PreferMemberInitializerCheck.h - clang-tidy ------------*- C++ -*-===// +// +// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions. +// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information. +// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception +// +//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===// + +#ifndef LLVM_CLANG_TOOLS_EXTRA_CLANG_TIDY_CPPCOREGUIDELINES_PREFERATOVERSUBSCRIPTOPERATORCHECK_H +#define LLVM_CLANG_TOOLS_EXTRA_CLANG_TIDY_CPPCOREGUIDELINES_PREFERATOVERSUBSCRIPTOPERATORCHECK_H + +#include "../ClangTidyCheck.h" + +namespace clang::tidy::cppcoreguidelines { + +/// Enforce CPP core guidelines SL.con.3 ---------------- PBHDK wrote:
Maybe we can just replace the Doxygen comment above with what's in the release notes + check description right now: > Flags the unsafe ``operator[]`` and suggests replacing it with ``at()``. What do you think? https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/95220 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
