================
@@ -373,6 +355,10 @@ <h2 id="c99">C99 implementation status</h2>
<td class="full" align="center">Yes</td>
</tr>
</table>
+<span id="complex">(2): Clang supports <code>_Complex</code> type specifiers
but
+does not support <code>_Imaginary</code> type specifiers. Support for
+<code>_Imaginary</code> is optional in C99 which is why Clang is fully
conforming.
----------------
jcranmer-intel wrote:
Maybe mention here something about not claiming Annex G conformance?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88161
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
