AaronBallman wrote:
> Note that
>
> ```c++
> auto div(_Complex float lhs, _Complex float rhs) {
> return lhs / rhs;
> }
>
> int main() {
> return __real div(1.f, 2.f);
> }
> ```
>
> will fail to link on windows due to `__divsc3` not being available. Similar
> programs probably also fail due to other compiler-rt functions not being
> available.
I *think* Clang still gets to claim conformance here because we handle the
language side of things correctly and the user is responsible for linking to a
runtime library with appropriate support for the platform. However, this sure
does straddle the line in some ways, so I could see this being a reason to
claim "partial" conformance.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88161
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
