================
@@ -136,6 +136,24 @@ TEST(InterpreterTest, DeclsAndStatements) {
EXPECT_TRUE(!!R2);
}
+TEST(InterpreterTest, PTUStack) {
+ clang::IncrementalCompilerBuilder CB;
+ auto CI = cantFail(CB.CreateCpp());
+
+ llvm::Error Err = llvm::Error::success();
+ auto Interp = std::make_unique<Interpreter>(std::move(CI), Err);
+ cantFail(std::move(Err));
+
+ auto NumBuiltinPTUs = Interp->getEffectivePTUSize();
+ cantFail(Interp->Parse("void firstRuntimePTU() {}"));
+ EXPECT_EQ(NumBuiltinPTUs + 1, Interp->getEffectivePTUSize());
----------------
weliveindetail wrote:
Yes, that's right. In fact, we could just not expose it right now and instead
keep this a NFC. Then we don't need a new test either.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84176
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
