Stefan =?utf-8?q?Gränitz?= <[email protected]>
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To: <llvm.org/llvm/llvm-project/pull/[email protected]>
================
@@ -136,6 +136,24 @@ TEST(InterpreterTest, DeclsAndStatements) {
EXPECT_TRUE(!!R2);
}
+TEST(InterpreterTest, PTUStack) {
+ clang::IncrementalCompilerBuilder CB;
+ auto CI = cantFail(CB.CreateCpp());
+
+ llvm::Error Err = llvm::Error::success();
+ auto Interp = std::make_unique<Interpreter>(std::move(CI), Err);
+ cantFail(std::move(Err));
+
+ auto NumBuiltinPTUs = Interp->getEffectivePTUSize();
+ cantFail(Interp->Parse("void firstRuntimePTU() {}"));
+ EXPECT_EQ(NumBuiltinPTUs + 1, Interp->getEffectivePTUSize());
----------------
vgvassilev wrote:
Wouldn’t using the public interpreter::Undo indirectly achieve the same effect?
If it errors out we will know the size of the builtin PTUs.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84176
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
