erichkeane wrote: > Hmm, no, I landed it because I made an assumption that there's simply not > that much interest in this work (I'm quite depressed about this in general > lately) so as a code owner I just made a call that it's probably good enough > to go and rely on post-commit review. Now that you bring this up, it does > sound a lot like I should get myself out of this mindset and at least ping > people first. Especially Erich who I specifically invited as the code owner > of clang attributes. Absolutely my bad. I definitely see how this isn't great > moving forward and I will do better from now on. Should I also revert and > give you folks time to properly review and course-correct me?
I hadn't noticed that you were the Analysis code owner. I don't really see anything in the Clang stuff (which IS attributes and my perview) that require a revert. Sorry for letting this drop off my backlog, I did one review on it at one point, then for some reason didn't come back to it. A ping would have been appreciated (for next time), but no need to revert this time. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/80371 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits