rmaprath added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D26139#587587, @mclow.lists wrote:
> > I think it might be better to add TEST_TRY and TEST_CATCH(...) macros > > defined like > > @rogfer01 said at the top that he didn't want to add "a magical TEST_TRY > macro" - and I agree. Someone tried that in another review, and I nixed it > there. I had a proposal for something along those lines in https://reviews.llvm.org/D14653, however those TEST_TRY and TEST_CATCH macros were trying to be "too smart". I agree, having macros for `try` and `catch` sounds to me like it would set the wrong precedent. https://reviews.llvm.org/D26139 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
