chandlerc added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D23752#581436, @mgorny wrote:
> This really doesn't solve the problems we have. We don't want to build and > install two almost-identical copies of compiler-rt and clang headers, when we > can just build one and make clang use it. However, as I said before, I don't really think that this approach makes sense. I don't think we should be building Clang to re-use parts of some other Clang installation. I understand that is exactly what you want to do, but I disagree that it is a good idea. I think it is brittle and failure prone. I suggested ways you could make it work for your use cases however, but I don't think changing the CMake in this way is valid. https://reviews.llvm.org/D23752 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
