================
@@ -978,6 +978,20 @@ bool Parser::ConsumeAndStoreFunctionPrologue(CachedTokens
&Toks) {
} else {
break;
}
+ // Pack indexing
+ if (getLangOpts().CPlusPlus26 && Tok.is(tok::ellipsis) &&
----------------
philnik777 wrote:
> @philnik777 This would require GCC to also support that as an extension in
> C++11 (and above). Otherwise we wouldn't be able to use it in our tuple
> implementation.
Yeah, obviously. But if one implementation adds it, it becomes a lot more
likely that others do it too. I also suspect that libstdc++ may also really
like this.
> Would a change like that be possible without being an ABI break?
I don't know, but IMO it would even be worth just adding it in ABIv2 if we can
get it as an extension. I expect this to bring a _lot_ of improvement in terms
of compile times and debug binary size.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/72644
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
