================
@@ -978,6 +978,20 @@ bool Parser::ConsumeAndStoreFunctionPrologue(CachedTokens
&Toks) {
} else {
break;
}
+ // Pack indexing
+ if (getLangOpts().CPlusPlus26 && Tok.is(tok::ellipsis) &&
----------------
ldionne wrote:
@philnik777 This would require GCC to also support that as an extension in
C++11 (and above). Otherwise we wouldn't be able to use it in our tuple
implementation. If we had such an extension, I suspect compilation times for
any tuple-heavy code would go down quite a bit. In fact the most interesting
part is that we might be able to simplify how we store elements inside the
tuple -- right now we have to use some kind of base class trick because that's
how we manage to perform indexing afterwards, but that's expensive.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/72644
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
