mordante wrote:

> @mordante The lines could be changed to `// expected-error-re@*:* 0-1 
> {{{{(excess elements in struct initializer|no matching constructor for 
> initialization of)}}{{.*}}}}` to still have coverage. FWIW the `{{.*}}` at 
> the end seems to be redundant too.

Totally forgot using 0 occurrences are valid in this syntax. I'll make a new 
patch. I'll keep the redundant part, the entire expected will be redundant in 
about a year. 

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76833
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to